Sunday, April 5, 2015

Technology to Control Technology?

This morning, it was brought to my attention that there is a company that has a prototype pepper grinder (not for sale yet) that shuts down electronics in your house when it is used.

Without going all tech-nerd and putting everyone to sleep, the device can connect via remote device management software (see that alone almost put me to sleep) and will send a message to any of your electronics that are connected to shut them down during dinner.

Wait, you need a pepper grinder to do that? How about a circuit breaker, how about you pull the plug? Better yet, tell your kids, "No electronics at the table."

The company that is developing this says on their website ( http://tinyurl.com/mo9gbn5 ),

"We’ve all had that annoying experience with friends or family where you sit down for dinner, but everyone’s checking Instagram and tweeting about the new lox & bagel Bloody Mary instead of being together."

OK, first things first. Not everyone has had that annoying experience. Some of us have set guidelines for our family (and yes, our friends too, which might explain why we don't have a lot of people over for dinner) that dinner time is time to reconnect with each other after a long day.

The expectation has always been that there will be no electronics (or any books or other reading materials for that matter) during dinner. We eat, we talk about the day, we laugh about absurd things (like what did baby dinosaurs sound like, does everyone see the color green the same way, recounting family stories that sometimes makes us laugh until we cry). We build a shared history during dinner, and other times when we have time to reminisce together.

Dinner is the time when our kids asked questions in the safety of home without fear of being judged. This is the time where a lot of good conversations happened.

Technology can do a lot of great things for us, but it shouldn't replace our roles as parents to our children. We need to set expectations and limits for our kids. They are smart, they'll learn what the limits are, but they don't need technology to do it.

Will they try to push the limits? Yes, but that is all part of the parenting process. We set limits and expectations, we teach our children, we nurture them, and we (are supposed to) prepare them for being adults. If we rely on technology to control technology we are sending the wrong message to our children.

I don't begrudge the company designing the pepper grinder, I just hope that more people than not will realize that they don't need a pepper grinder that shuts down all of the electronics. If this is what it takes to get your family to reconnect during dinner I don't want to know what will come next.

Parents need to parent, children need their parents to parent. Don't let technology replace parenting. When your child scores the winning touchdown, or wins the Nobel Peace Prize, you don't want them looking in the camera and saying, "I'd like to thank the i-Grinder for keeping me focused during dinner."

I have a better idea, let's sell these pepper grinders to restaurants with a slight modification. When the pepper grinders are activated, all cell phone signals are blocked. That way, when people go out to dinner with friends or significant others they can actually spend time talking, and not worrying about who liked their status, or their tweet.

Hey, if it's good enough for kids it must be good enough for adults.




Sunday, November 13, 2011

Multitasking..........


In today’s fast paced world, everyone is being asked to do more with less.  Gone are the days when there would be enough resources to get the job done in a comfortable manner.  Now we keep finding ways to add on more work to people and cut back on the number of people doing the work.

At first glance you could look at anyone who has had to take on more work because of the shrinking workforce and you would say that they’re really doing a great job multi-tasking.

Is anyone really multi-tasking though?  I would argue that we are not.  Although it feels like we have too many things to get done on any given day and yet we still find a way to get it done, we are still only focusing on the task at hand.

Think of a variety show (for those of you too young to remember variety shows go to YouTube on the inter-webs and look up Ed Sullivan or Carol Burnett) that features a plate spinner.  The person spinning the plates certainly has his/her hands full.  They are keeping more plates spinning than I have in my kitchen cupboard.  They are the perfect metaphor for how we are living our professional (and personal) lives right now.  I would guess that if you ask people if they sometimes felt like a plate spinner they would reply in the positive.

Here’s where we can see how people truly “multi-task.”  We aren’t actually focused on all of the plates at any given time. We get a plate spinning (kick off a project, upgrade, etc.) and then we move on to the next plate.  We get that one spinning and move on to the next one. 

When we get the third plate spinning we probably have to go back to the first one and make sure it is still spinning enough to allow us to get the next one started.  The more plates we get spinning, the less time (obviously) we have to dedicate to any single plate.  Does this sound familiar to anyone?  If not, please contact me, I’d like your job.

What I just described works well for anyone who chooses to spin plates as their profession.  The process to keep a plate spinning is pretty straight-forward. 

1.     Is the plate about to fall?  If no, ignore.  If yes, go to step 2
2.     Spin plate

There’s not thinking about what the next step is when you look at a plate and realize it is going to fall.  You just spin it to get it going again. 

Most projects/assignments at work are not that simple.  Stepping away to focus on something else means having to come back and remember where you left off so you can continue to work on it.  The time to remember where you were and what your thought process was can be substantial.  Now, not only are we not multi-tasking, we’re losing efficiency every time we stop to “spin another plate.”

The loss of efficiency is not the only thing to be concerned about in our new world.  There’s also the issue of being able to focus on an issue and working it to completion.  I used to be able to spend time on a book, or an issue at work until I completed the task. 

Now, the constant barrage of multiple responsibilities and the different ways I can be distracted makes me feel like I’ve got ADD.  In the time I’ve taken to write this all down I’ve looked at email, updated my Facebook status, checked out Amazon.com for the latest geeky toy that I need, and programmed my DVR so I don’t miss “When Kittens Attack – Part IV.”

For now we will continue to do more with less, but I’m curious to see what the future holds, and how fragmented our lives become.

Now, I have to go clean up the plates that I dropped.

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Short Term Rules vs. Long Term Success


I’ve been thinking about all of the conversations that I have with friends and coworkers about growing up and the things that have changed.  When we were younger we actually rode in cars without seatbelts.  We rode our bicycles without helmets.  We even skied without helmets, yet we managed to survive to adulthood (even if we don’t act like adults sometimes).  Today, as a society, it seems like we go overboard to protect ourselves, and our children from every thing and we could be setting our kids up for failure in the future.

There are things that have changed over the years that make total sense.  I cannot imagine riding in a car without wearing a seatbelt, or snowboarding (I was never very good with two planks strapped to my feet) without a helmet.  The question is whether or not we’ve gone too far in some respects.

The catalyst for this post was the Little League World Series.  I was watching one of the games, and I saw the on deck batter standing in the dugout with his helmet on, and the bat resting on his shoulder.  I know from coaching a team when my sons played that nobody is allowed outside of the dugout except the person who is at bat.  I understand the premise behind the rule.  We are trying to keep our kids safe.

I’m sure this rule was instituted because either a player who was on deck got hit by a foul ball, or somebody walked by too close to the on deck circle and got hit by a practice swing.  I’m not sure how many times this happened, but I don’t believe this happened very often.  If it happened a lot we would be running out of kids to play baseball.  If this rule saves one child from what could be a serious injury people will say it is worth it.  But I have to question whether or not this rule really makes sense in the long run.

Wouldn’t it be wiser to teach the kids that when they are in the on deck circle they have to pay attention to the game?  Also, wouldn’t it make more sense to reinforce the idea of being aware of your surroundings when you are walking by the on deck circle and stay away from the person swinging the bat? 

By enacting this rule, we are protecting our kids, but we’re also giving them a pass on thinking.  I want our population (including kids) to be aware of their situation and use critical thinking skills. 

Here I go, sounding like an old man.  Back in my day, kids were smart enough to avoid a person swinging a baseball bat.  We didn’t understand physics, but we did understand pain.  I know of very few instances of kids getting hit by a bat that was being swung by the on-deck batter.  The kids that did realized that they should have been paying attention.  When it happened the child was sore for a few days, but they never forgot the lesson they were taught.

You can’t teach common sense, but do we really need rules and laws that try to protect people who have no common sense?  It doesn’t seem feasible to continue to make rules or laws that cover every possible situation that could arise because of a lack of common sense.

It’s a minor thing, this rule, but it is a reflection of where we are as a society.  I believe that if we make people responsible for their decisions and hold them accountable we will have a stronger society.  We’ll also have a population that hasn’t had common sense legislated out of them.